Skip to main content

A Cost/Benefit Analysis of Getting an Apricot™

    Many of you who have referred cases to me over the last three plus decades know that for the last 10 years I have been writing ApricotsTM. An ApricotTM is a work-product privileged report written for an insurance adjuster and/or an attorney who believes they have a substantially flawed psychological or psychiatric report that can harm their client’s case. My job is to find and describe those flaws in nontechnical language and to discuss the specific techniques and strategy for cross-examining the doctor with simple questions designed to get those flaws on the record during a deposition or trial despite the doctor’s potential evasiveness. That same ApricotTM can be used to write a brief for the trial court or an appeal. 

    One fact that has always fascinated me is that the vast majority of reports coming from forensic psychiatrists and psychologists are substantially flawed. Last month I wrote a newsletter addressing the question, “Why Are There So Many Weak Psych Reports?” So, this month I’m going to talk about the economics of ApricotsTM. 

    How much does an ApricotTM cost? The answer to this question must first address the issue of how an ApricotTM works. With few exceptions, the strategy for demonstrating that a psychiatrist’s or a psychologist’s report is substantially flawed rests on showing that there is no support for the doctor’s or their failure to make a diagnosis. This is done by revealing that there are no data in the doctor’s report indicating either that the patient has met the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnostic criteria. Essentially, in the case of the former, the cost depends on the number of diagnoses that must be addressed. The more incorrect diagnoses provided by the doctor the more time it takes me to show that they have erred sufficiently to disqualify their report as being capable of proving or disproving a disputed medical fact. At the very least you can expect to pay about $4,000 and the office record is about $12,000 with most reports costing about $7,000 to $8,000. If you’re concerned about how much a specific report might cost to demolish, just send it to me by email and I’ll tell you exactly what’s wrong with it and give you a free estimate. 

    Now, is it worth it? Well, if you’re a personal injury defense lawyer what is your exposure? If the plaintiff was in an automobile accident and is claiming a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder as well as some physical injuries, how much of the potential loss to the carrier is the claim of a psych injury? Simple arithmetic. Similarly, if you are a personal injury plaintiff attorney and the defense has gotten a washout report, how much of the potential gain will be lost to you and your client if that washout report is allowed to stand? Again, simple arithmetic. 

    Moving on to workers’ compensation, the same logic applies. At the risk of being old school and trite, how much is it going to be worth to you and your client to demonstrate that the opposing doctor’s report is not worth the paper it’s written on? Simple arithmetic. Most importantly, it won’t cost you anything if I can’t show the report is flawed and provide you with a set of questions to ask the doctor during a deposition or a trial that will clearly and unequivocally demonstrate that the doctor has not shown what he or she has claimed in their conclusions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Psychiatrists and Psychological Testing: A Frequent Nightmare

     As a psychologist who helps attorneys effectively cross-examine psychiatrists and psychologists I frequently have the opportunity to read depositions and trial records.       In those cross-examinations, psychiatrists are often asked about the results of psychological testing that is sometimes completely left out of their examinations and reports.       The most bizarre testimonies are in response to questions about their failure to administer a keystone psychological test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). More often than you might imagine, a psychiatrist will openly testify something like, “I didn’t give an MMPI because I’m not an expert in psychological testing.”       This kind of answer is bizarre because a forensic psychiatrist’s job is to evaluate the patient and arrive at a conclusion about whether or not they have a psychological disorder, and if so, what is it’s likely cause, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It Takes A Renegade Psychologist To Expose Flawed Psych Reports

     I’ve been writing this newsletter and publishing one issue each month since 2009. This is the 140th issue of my newsletter providing what I feel is valuable information for attorneys and insurance adjusters who read medical-legal reports from psychologists, psychiatrists and neuropsychologists. All of my newsletters can be downloaded for free from my website: DrLeckartWETC.com. The motivation for writing these newsletters has been my 30+ years of evaluating approximately 10,000 personal injury and workers’ compensation litigants and my time as a university professor at San Diego State University, during which it has been no secret that psychologists, psychiatrists and neuropsychologists who write medical-legal reports count on not being called on their errors because it is difficult to find a doctor who is willing to stand up and call them on their mistakes. Perhaps they count on their “fraternity” and “sorority” brothers and sisters in the profession not to make wav...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Economics of Dismantling Flawed Psych Reports

     I’ve been doing personal injury and workers’ compensation psych cases for over thirty years. In that time I have evaluated about 10,000 claimants. I’ve also reviewed about 50,000 psych reports. For the last 12 years I have written reports and given testimony that conclusively demonstrates that the vast majority of the opposing doctor’s reports are substantially flawed and can be revealed on cross-examination of the doctor to be worthless with regard to a judge and/or jury drawing a reasonable conclusion that a claimant has had a psychiatric injury. As part of what I write in my reports, which are commissioned to critique the opposing doctor’s conclusions, I provide attorneys with a specifically designed line of direct questions that demonstrate to even the most unsophisticated juror the worthlessness of the opposing doctor’s opinions.       My reports are not inexpensive. A typical report costs between $6,000 and $10,000, depending on the number ...
Post a Comment
Read more